A Critical Analysis of Empiricism

Hossain, F. M. Anayet (2014) A Critical Analysis of Empiricism. Open Journal of Philosophy, 04 (03). pp. 225-230. ISSN 2163-9434

[thumbnail of OJPP_2014080615104881.pdf] Text
OJPP_2014080615104881.pdf - Published Version

Download (870kB)

Abstract

Empiricism is a philosophical theory which argues that human knowledge is derived entirely from sensory experience. As a branch of epistemology, empiricism disregards the concept of instinctive ideas and focuses entirely on experience and evidence as it relates to sensory perception. Empiricism is a philosophical school holding that knowledge can only be (or is primarily) gained from sensory experience. Accordingly, it rejects any (or much) use of a priori reasoning in the gathering and analysis of knowledge. It rivals rationalism according to which reason is the ultimate source of knowledge. The philosophy of empiricism was first put forth in John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Locke argued that the only way by which human acquire knowledge is through experience. Locke firmly argued that humans are incapable of formulating or possessing inherent ideas. The aim of this paper is to explain that the traditional empiricist standpoint in the fields of epistemology and then try to show that it is not adequate for explaining some things relevant to these fields. For that the traditional empiricist methods needs to be supplemented by extra-logical principles that are not strictly empirical.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: OA STM Library > Social Sciences and Humanities
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@oastmlibrary.com
Date Deposited: 20 Jul 2024 09:32
Last Modified: 20 Jul 2024 09:32
URI: http://geographical.openscholararchive.com/id/eprint/1245

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item